Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 72 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    23 comments  ·  Nimble » Contacts  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi,

    We plan on adding more criteria to Advanced Search.

    For now, we have added “Is Not” as advanced search criteria.

    We also have “Or” as criteria for search, if you search for "Find people or companies that match “any” of the following", it will function as an “Or” search.

    If you search for "Find people or companies that match “all” of the following", it will function as an “And” search.

    We will need to do more work to add search for numerical values such as “Greater/Less/Equal to” and the same goes for “Birthdays”. We will update this thread when we have more information on these fronts.

    Thank you for your feedback and support!

    Best regards,

    Joseph

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hugely helpful. As an owner who has the job of rallying his troops to use and love Nimble, little things like this that allow them to immediately increase sales are invaluable.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Nimble » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi,

    Thanks for submitting this request. We definitely see value in being able to add sub-tags to your current tags for better organization.

    This request is under review and if it receives more votes, we’ll invest more time in bringing it to completion.

    Best,

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is an extraordinary powerful idea. Batchbook does it very well. Tags within tags is a much easier way to manage generic information than using custom fields.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base